|
The muscle
atrophy that is commonly seen with EPM is also asymmetrical. It
is usually most obvious over the hindquarters. Muscle atrophy takes
a couple of weeks to become obvious, so this sign may not be apparent
at first.
Horses with
EPM may also show evidence of brain involvement, in particular,
cranial nerve deficits. These signs include facial paralysis, drooping
ear, lazy eyelid, and difficulty eating and swallowing. As with
the other signs, cranial nerve deficits are usually asymmetrical
and highly variable. In some cases the signs reflect cerebral or
cerebellar disease. Horses with EPM usually do not have a fever,
depression, or loss of appetite, even though they may have difficulty
eating. (Cerebral, cerebellar, and cranial nerve signs are listed
in Figure 12-44.)
Diagnosis of EPM
In many cases
the veterinarian suspects EPM simply on the signs, although there
are several other neurologic diseases that can cause similar signs.
In a horse with very mild signs, musculoskeletal causes of vague
lameness or gait abnormalities should be ruled out before concentrating
on the nervous system. Nuclear scintigraphy (see Chapter 2)
often helps to pinpoint the site(s) of low-grade lameness when physical
examination and other tests cannot.
What tests are available to diagnose EPM?
At present the only way to confirm the diagnosis of EPM in the live
horse is by taking a sample of cerebrospinal fluid. This is usually
done with a lumbosacral tap. The CSF sample is tested for antibodies
against the parasite (serology), or for protozoal DNA using PCR.
The serology test, called Western blot immunoassay, is used more
often than PCR.
If the veterinarian
cannot collect CSF from the horse, he or she may treat the horse
based on the signs. This approach is reasonable; however, without
a definite diagnosis it is impossible to know whether the horse
actually has EPM. Treating the horse for EPM when it has another
neurologic condition delays appropriate treatment. Also, the treatment
for EPM can be expensive. Wherever possible the diagnosis should
be confirmed.
Interpreting the Test Results
According to
recent research, up to 50% of all horses (both normal horses and
those with neurologic signs) have been exposed to this Sarcocystis
and so have detectable antibodies in their bloodstreams. But detecting
antibodies in the bloodstream only proves that the horse has been
exposed to the parasite in the past. It does not mean that the parasite
caused, or will cause disease, or even is still present in the body.
Therefore, testing for antibodies in a blood sample is usually
a waste of time and can even be misleading if it is the only test
performed. (This is why requesting a blood test for EPM during
a prepurchase examination is discouraged by most veterinarians,
especially when there are no suspicions of neurologic disease.)
Treating a horse for EPM because it had a positive blood test is
an even bigger waste of time and money in most cases. Nevertheless,
in attempting to diagnose EPM, it is often useful for the veterinarian
to submit both blood and CSF samples to the laboratory,
especially if the CSF sample was contaminated with blood. Some veterinarians
use the blood test as a "screen." If the blood test is
negative, it is unlikely that the horse has EPM. However, if the
blood test is positive, the CSF should be tested to determine whether
the horse has the disease.
|